Serval: So! although it is pseudo-random! this opacity for both user and developer provides an apparent randomness that you think is sufficient. Does that not mean that in the end! we’re entering a notion of faith! in the sense that users must have faith in the fact that the machine will let chance choose? Which brings us to the myth of Joshua that is covered in the article. Is it really desirable for Men to maintain the same relationship with learning machines that the Jews did with the Talmud God! when they are only pretending to do
Something that they cannot in fact do?
Grinbaum: I prefer to use the term “trust”. In effect the user’s trust is fundamental. On this subject I tell a Bible tale. At the end make sure they are on top of the product this story! when Joshua says to Achan “I pray you! make a confession. It is by a draw of lots that the land will be divided amongst the tribes of Israel”! he understands that it is not his life that is at stake but the trust the people shall place in the procedure. A chapter of my book is called “
Never will a throw of die abolish trust”.
In it I am looking to find out how to maintain this trust. It is very difficult because using randomness raises not only evolution of b2b e-com platforms questions! but also psychological and political questions. Yet in these areas! today! everything goes against trust. We see it for example in the APB or platforms… When you tell people that we’re going to use a random draw! they find it unacceptable and even unfair! even if this perception is tending to evolve with time.
e are many options for sharing content and engaging with your audience! such as stories ! live videos ! IGTV and reels . Each of be numbers options can be used in different ways.
In stories ! for example! you can encourage audience interaction by running polls and placing question boxes . With live broadcasts! you can interact with your audience in real time and even save them for others to watch later.